Categories
Medicine

This paper should be an annotated bibliography with 5 scholarly sources, double

This paper should be an annotated bibliography with 5 scholarly sources, double spaced, APA format with an title paragraph and conclusion. sources should be cited properly. This paper should be written about a controversy in the medical field about RSV in infants, children and also in adults. the long- and short-term effects on both, courses of action for treatment, and studies and growth with RSV.

Categories
Medicine

This paper should be an annotated bibliography with 5 scholarly sources, double

This paper should be an annotated bibliography with 5 scholarly sources, double spaced, APA format with an title paragraph and conclusion. sources should be cited properly. This paper should be written about a controversy in the medical field about RSV in infants, children and also in adults. the long- and short-term effects on both, courses of action for treatment, and studies and growth with RSV.

Categories
Medicine

Please use scholarly sources less than 5 years. see attached: Review the Healt

Please use scholarly sources less than 5 years.
see attached:
Review the Healthy People 2030 Health Care Access and Quality objective related to prescriiption medications. Consider how your treatment plan might change for this client if he did not have insurance coverage for prescriiptions. What is the cost of the medication you suggested in your treatment plan? Is there a more affordable alternative? What resources are available to clients in your area who do not have insurance coverage for prescriiptions?

Categories
Medicine

write disscution, conclution , abstract disscution include : Provide a clear a

write disscution, conclution , abstract
disscution include :
Provide a clear and concise comparison of your study design to published work (idea was taken from)
Explain what the anticipated results of your study would mean
How does your study advance the field?
Critically analyse what is significant and interesting in
Methodology and make careful interpretations
Extrapolate with care beyond this study
try to avoid any unfounded speculations
Put key findings into context with existing research, implication and/or hypothesis.
State the limitations of the work
Discuss future work, which builds on this study

Categories
Medicine

will be provided later Dissertation – Systematic Review – 12.000 words My resea

will be provided later
Dissertation – Systematic Review – 12.000 words
My research question is this.. “Is McKenzie effective for treating the neck in elderly individuals?”
– If, after investigating, you are unable to locate 8–12 primary studies that could be incorporated into this systematic review, feel free to revise my research topic.-
Qualitative review (thematic analysis, narrative synthesis) OR quantitative review (metanalysis), explaining why you didn’t / Did utilise it. For this review, stick to a single methodology and don’t combine any. Choose one option only: quantitative review or qualitative evaluation.
Limitation and strengths
– Discuss bias under “limitations and strengths” ( it must be acknowledged the risck of bias, limitation e.g. not being able to work in a group and strength e.g. being able to have a supervisor, another limitation is that the narrative synthesis lacks precision, there is no excepted or form of techniques with the narrative synthesis, )
Academic writing level 7
Review Design
In this systematic review, the PICO model suited to quantitative research
The results of PICO analysis are shown below:
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
Data Extraction Form
Key Elements
Data Extraction Form Template (2017)
https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
– For each study needs to be done a table
6. Data analysis
7. Timetable
8. References (including 8-12 primary research studies)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatemtnt/flowDiagram
Appendix A: Search string
Appendix B: Databases/ search engines
Appendix C: preliminary search history from
Appendix D:Trials identified during preliminary searching
Appendix E: Critical appraisal tool
Appendix F: Data extraction form
USE Prisma (PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram
Data Extraction Form Template (2017) – https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
Adapted From Cornell University Library (2022)
https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evidence-synthesis/data-extraction
We were given the following link as an illustration of a systematic review.
https://paahjournal.com/articles/10.5334/paah.190
www.casp-uk.net (critical appraisal skills programme (CASP)
https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (to evaluate the literature)
http://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools (to assist in evaluating trust Worthing)
https://training.cochrane.org/sites/training.cochrane.org/files/public/iploads/resources/Hanbook5_1/Chapter_8_Handbook_5_2_8pdf – ( Quality & Risk of Bias?)

Categories
Medicine

As an attending at Banner University Medical Center, my clinical responsibilitie

As an attending at Banner University Medical Center, my clinical responsibilities include the following:
• Inpatient stroke services for 14-16 weeks
• Stroke clinic at north campus 2 times/week
• Staffing residents & fellows stroke clinic
• Providing education to students, residents, and fellows during either rounds or lectures
As leadership:
– Nominated as a program associate in 9/2022 . Since then,
I helped resident and fellow to create the schedule and create a backup plan for resident coverage in case of emergency. Also, I’m working to create a new model for the resident evaluation. The goal of this model to improve the quality of the evaluation system for the residents. In addition, it will help the mentors the guide the resident for their future.
-I’m also a member of stroke committee: our most recent joint commission review yielded a full 2 years accreditation cycle and we were commended for our significant compliance with the guidelines. In addition I’m coaching 2 stroke fellows that joined the stroke program each year.
Patient Centered Service
• As a part of a practical community-centered approach, our stroke clinic provides a support group for stroke survivors and their loved ones. I have served as a facilitator for this organized support group
• My patient care philosophy: treat every patient as if they are family or friends. I dedicated my time and effort to listening and answering all patient’s concerns and questions. As a treating physician, I understand that a stroke patient is a complex individual with emotions, lifestyle, family, and other factors that I must evaluate carefully as a part of the diagnosis and treatment to achieve the best result. Never forget that a patient is a person; I usually pay attention to patient’s and family need and provide the best answer to comfort family and the patient. In addition, I usually uptodate with the treatment guideline, however, I examine many factors before making treatment recommendations. While a “by-the-numbers” approach is faster and more efficient for many practitioners, it rarely yields optimal results for you.

Categories
Medicine

write disscution, conclution , abstract disscution include : Provide a clear a

write disscution, conclution , abstract
disscution include :
Provide a clear and concise comparison of your study design to published work (idea was taken from)
Explain what the anticipated results of your study would mean
How does your study advance the field?
Critically analyse what is significant and interesting in
Methodology and make careful interpretations
Extrapolate with care beyond this study
try to avoid any unfounded speculations
Put key findings into context with existing research, implication and/or hypothesis.
State the limitations of the work
Discuss future work, which builds on this study

Categories
Medicine

will be provided later Dissertation – Systematic Review – 12.000 words My resea

will be provided later
Dissertation – Systematic Review – 12.000 words
My research question is this.. “Is McKenzie effective for treating the neck in elderly individuals?”
– If, after investigating, you are unable to locate 8–12 primary studies that could be incorporated into this systematic review, feel free to revise my research topic.-
Qualitative review (thematic analysis, narrative synthesis) OR quantitative review (metanalysis), explaining why you didn’t / Did utilise it. For this review, stick to a single methodology and don’t combine any. Choose one option only: quantitative review or qualitative evaluation.
Limitation and strengths
– Discuss bias under “limitations and strengths” ( it must be acknowledged the risck of bias, limitation e.g. not being able to work in a group and strength e.g. being able to have a supervisor, another limitation is that the narrative synthesis lacks precision, there is no excepted or form of techniques with the narrative synthesis, )
Academic writing level 7
Review Design
In this systematic review, the PICO model suited to quantitative research
The results of PICO analysis are shown below:
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
Data Extraction Form
Key Elements
Data Extraction Form Template (2017)
https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
– For each study needs to be done a table
6. Data analysis
7. Timetable
8. References (including 8-12 primary research studies)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatemtnt/flowDiagram
Appendix A: Search string
Appendix B: Databases/ search engines
Appendix C: preliminary search history from
Appendix D:Trials identified during preliminary searching
Appendix E: Critical appraisal tool
Appendix F: Data extraction form
USE Prisma (PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram
Data Extraction Form Template (2017) – https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
Adapted From Cornell University Library (2022)
https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evidence-synthesis/data-extraction
We were given the following link as an illustration of a systematic review.
https://paahjournal.com/articles/10.5334/paah.190
www.casp-uk.net (critical appraisal skills programme (CASP)
https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (to evaluate the literature)
http://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools (to assist in evaluating trust Worthing)
https://training.cochrane.org/sites/training.cochrane.org/files/public/iploads/resources/Hanbook5_1/Chapter_8_Handbook_5_2_8pdf – ( Quality & Risk of Bias?)

Categories
Medicine

As an attending at Banner University Medical Center, my clinical responsibilitie

As an attending at Banner University Medical Center, my clinical responsibilities include the following:
• Inpatient stroke services for 14-16 weeks
• Stroke clinic at north campus 2 times/week
• Staffing residents & fellows stroke clinic
• Providing education to students, residents, and fellows during either rounds or lectures
As leadership:
– Nominated as a program associate in 9/2022 . Since then,
I helped resident and fellow to create the schedule and create a backup plan for resident coverage in case of emergency. Also, I’m working to create a new model for the resident evaluation. The goal of this model to improve the quality of the evaluation system for the residents. In addition, it will help the mentors the guide the resident for their future.
-I’m also a member of stroke committee: our most recent joint commission review yielded a full 2 years accreditation cycle and we were commended for our significant compliance with the guidelines. In addition I’m coaching 2 stroke fellows that joined the stroke program each year.
Patient Centered Service
• As a part of a practical community-centered approach, our stroke clinic provides a support group for stroke survivors and their loved ones. I have served as a facilitator for this organized support group
• My patient care philosophy: treat every patient as if they are family or friends. I dedicated my time and effort to listening and answering all patient’s concerns and questions. As a treating physician, I understand that a stroke patient is a complex individual with emotions, lifestyle, family, and other factors that I must evaluate carefully as a part of the diagnosis and treatment to achieve the best result. Never forget that a patient is a person; I usually pay attention to patient’s and family need and provide the best answer to comfort family and the patient. In addition, I usually uptodate with the treatment guideline, however, I examine many factors before making treatment recommendations. While a “by-the-numbers” approach is faster and more efficient for many practitioners, it rarely yields optimal results for you.

Categories
Medicine

* I don’t need a research paper yet. What I need is a specific AIMS page for now

* I don’t need a research paper yet. What I need is a specific AIMS page for now.
I was asked to read the Tourrete Syndrome Protocol ( I will send it to you) After reading the protocol I have to identify the research approach, develop a research question/ hypothesis and then ‘COMPLETE RESEARCH SPECIFIC AIMS PAGE’. I need from the Tourrete Syndrome Protocol to come up with a specific AIMS PAGE: It should consist of an introduction paragraph, your aims and a closing statement.